Effective length Description
When solving for the Beam Stability Factor (CL) the effective length of the wood must be used (in lieu of the actual length). The effective length is determined by the length of the beam, the dimensions of the beam, and the loading conditions (distributed load vs point load, etc.).
Note: For the following lu can be taken as the beams unbraced length.
Effective Length, le for bending members[1]:
| Table 1: Effective Length for Cantilevered Members | ||
| Loading Type | when lu/d < 7 | when lu/d > 7 |
| Uniformly distributed load | le = 1.33*lu | le = 0.9*lu + 3d |
| Concentrated load @ the unsupported end | le = 1.87*lu | le = 1.44*lu + 3d |
| Table 2: Effective Length for Single-Span Members | ||
| Loading Type | when lu/d < 7 | when lu/d > 7 |
| Uniformly distributed load | le = 2.06*lu | le = 1.63*lu + 3d |
| Concentrated load @ center w/ no intermediate lateral support | le = 1.80*lu | le = 1.37*lu + 3d |
| Concentrated load @ center w/ lateral support @ center | le = 1.11*lu | |
| Two equal concentrated loads @ 1/3 points with lateral support @ 1/3 points | le = 1.68*lu | |
| Three equal concentrated loads @ 1/4 points with lateral support @ 1/4 points | le = 1.54*lu | |
| Four equal concentrated loads @ 1/5 points with lateral support @ 1/5 points | le = 1.68*lu | |
| Equal end Moments | le = 1.84*lu | |
Note: Additional Loading combinations can be found in Table 3.3.3 of the NDS[1]
Members not found in the above tables or in Table 3.3.3 of the NDS:
For members not found in either the Table above, or the expanded NDS table, the following can be applied for either single span or cantilever members.
- le = 2.06*lu (when lu/d < 7)
- le = 1.63*lu + 3d (when 7< lu/d < 14.3)
- le = 1.84*lu (when lu/d > 14.3)
Note: These number are the conservative maximums for the effective length. And therefore if the above tables can be applied you would get a lower effective length (and therefore a higher allowable bending stress). Therefore it is recommended to use the above tables if possible, otherwise the above three scenarios can be used.
References:
- American Forest and Paper Association, "National Design Specification for Wood Construction", 2005